OER Assessment Rubric
Questions to ask about the OER you are thinking of using |
|
Poor
Is not of good quality or poorly defined. Use this if it does not meet your requirements.
0 pts
|
Unknown
This is not easily defined or assessed.
1 pts
|
Good
This is of good quality and is well defined. Good OER to use.
2 pts
|
NA
(N/A)
|
Creator knowledgable
2 pts
Who is the creator and what kind of expertise and experience do they have?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Creator Authenticity
2 pts
Are you reasonably certain that it is actually the work of the person claiming to be the author? (Not plagiarism or forgery.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Creator Bias
2 pts
What is the intended purpose? (Think educate/inform, sell something, entertain, change minds/behavior, even propaganda/hate speech)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Obvious Bias
2 pts
Are there obvious signs of bias or agenda? (logical fallacies, weasel words, loaded language, inappropriate appeals to emotion, addressing only one side of an issue, conflicts of interest, etc.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Organization Affiliation
2 pts
What is the "hosting" organization and what kind of reputation do they have?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Organization Quality Control
2 pts
Does the "hosting" organization conduct any sort of quality control? If so, what kind and how rigorous?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Quality Control Issues
2 pts
Are there obvious signs of poor quality control? (misspellings, broken images, poor formatting, terrible design, etc.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Organization Reputation
2 pts
What is the "hosting" organization's reputation for bias and agenda?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Organization Affiliations
2 pts
Are there any other "sponsors"? What is their reputation for bias and agenda?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Peer Reviewed
2 pts
Has it been through peer review? (Others are post-prints that have been through peer review).
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Material(s) Currency
2 pts
How recent or up-to-date is its content? (and how important is that to you?)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Platform Currency
2 pts
How recent or up-to-date is its format or platform? (you don't want it to be too old or too new, or else some people won't be able to use it.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Content Reviews
2 pts
Are there ratings, reviews, or comments? If so, what can you learn from them?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Content Relevancy
2 pts
Does the resource address your topic from the appropriate discipline or other perspective?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Quality of Information
2 pts
How would you rate the quality of the information? (factual correctness, methodology, logic, etc.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Meet Target Audience
2 pts
Is the target audience appropriate for your use? (Think age group, educational level)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Licensing Status
2 pts
What is its copyright and licensing status and how does that impact what you can do with it?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Accessibility (Human)
2 pts
Is it accessible to people with disabilities? (Closed captions or transcripts for the Deaf, compatible with screen readers and text-to-speech for the sight-impaired.)
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Accessibility (Computer)
2 pts
Is it accessible to people using older computers and slow internet connections?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|
Remix or Edit
2 pts
If you want to remix it, is the source file available, and in a format that you can edit?
|
Poor
|
Unknown
|
Good
|
NA
|